tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1954032186621541669.post5683048688533132356..comments2023-12-23T07:04:04.016-08:00Comments on Thinking Faith: Natural and UnnaturalBill Trenchhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17055902411464959661noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1954032186621541669.post-43283704920324792012012-02-27T07:42:25.393-08:002012-02-27T07:42:25.393-08:00Fornicators, idolaters, adulterers, male prostitut...Fornicators, idolaters, adulterers, male prostitutes, sodomites, thieves, the greedy, drunkards, revilers, robbers...<br />Wow, there are so many points to make here. Well, no, so many things to touch on, but really only one point to make: Which of us is without sin? I see no distinction made between the fornicator and the robber nor any of those mentioned in between. I personally have never been a male prostitute or a sodomite... but I have been a fornicator, a reviler and greedy. This is like a "pick your failing" list. I think we look at this and say "See, says right here that sodomites are just as bad as idolators!" But I think it also says that greedy people (and really, who has never been greedy?) are just as bad as thieves and prostitutes. This passage can be summed up again as "You ain't too good for a whoopin'".Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com